This response is off topic per the first post. Thank you for submitting another example for why this Discourse needs to be token gated per the 2nd highest viewed discussion in this form: Token-gating this forum for lilnouns holders - #9 by travsap. Interest and participation in general discussion is always appreciated if you’re offering information from a place of understanding or experience, or asking questions. But if you’re new to the project, have missed most of the discussion that’s already taken place, and then move into governance discourse to offer insight without understanding, and without any stake in the treasury or voting power, please don’t. It’s intrusive and distracting. The purpose of proposals is for those with voting power to vote on adjustments to the DAO that serve them, not you.
—
TLDR: Your response is patently false and you failed to read the first post — if you don’t believe in scarcity or a deflationary supply schedule, create another thread. This thread was explicitly for discussion seeking a vetted resolution for those who do believe a deflationary schedule is necessary to drive continued demand. NFT’s are tokens and currency. Currencies do not function without scarcity. What you’re proposing (printing Lil Nouns into oblivion because it’s a “constant source of cash flow” ignores basic supply and demand economics. What you’re suggesting here is equivalent to the dollar pretending to function as the world’s reserve currency while it’s exploited by and printed for a select few to inflate their wallets and wage war. The dollar has already been hyperinflated into oblivion and lost 99% of its purchasing power since inception due to inflation and leaving a fixed supply gold standard. Yes 99%. Please curb your ignorance in governance discourse when you fail to understand the topic of discussion.